|
hmm.. string literals, I've added "\x[NN]NN" and "\u[NN]NN" support now (the former giving raw hex input, the latter doing the 1-5byte conversion.
Sure, that's not an absolute requirement, but a neato anyhow.The rest is all in string.* namespace, that is, lstrlib. Haven't looked at the existing code (Unicode patch) yet, but I will. thanks.
-akto Rici: thanks for the offer, but.. did it already? :) You could still send in the (string literals) patch so I can compare the approaches. Perhaps harmonize the syntax, too.
Klaus Ripke kirjoitti 23.5.2005 kello 2.44:
Hi Asko On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 02:18:01AM +0300, Asko Kauppi wrote:The goal for me would be UTF-8 only, boldly ignoring the issues with existing data in other encodings. For that, a couple of patching points within Lua will be required, already started the work. :)... not to stop you from work, just curious, what would require patching other than lstrlib? And what's wrong with the existing lstrlib alternative? cheers