[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] LuaBinaries
- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@...>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 21:59:18 -0500
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:30:28AM -0300, Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
> So, another poll: in Unix systems, should the standard makefile
> create static libraries (.a)? Does anyone still needs the standard
> liblua.a/liblualib.a files? Maybe the standard makefile could create
> only the 'lua' executable...
When cross-compiling on Unix for an embedded target, static libraries
are extremely important.
I also tend to link Lua statically in my Linux binaries, since it's
very small and a lot of systems don't have Lua installed--we have lots
of runtime deps, so being able to cut down on one of them (as well as
eliminating version differences) is worth the small bloat.
--
Glenn Maynard
