[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Some small requests for the next release
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:33:20 -0300
> I guess the Lua authors have already considered this possibility
> (because it's so simple to implement), but probably rejected it.
One problem is that it does not extend nicely to tables. If you could
write "s:len()", it would be quite reasonable to expect "t:next(k)" to
work as well. However, to have a default metatable for tables has two
drawbacks (at least):
- a change in that metatable could affect the behaviour of the whole
program in subtle ways (e.g., making all tables not to return nil for
- once a table gets its own metatable, you cannot operate on it as
"expected" (that is, "t:next(k)" won't work on that table anymore).