lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

But there could be many.

	require "obj_adams"  :)
	require "obj_barebones"
	require "obj_pythonese"

The point being, instead of building a whole system from the ground up (and doing all the mistakes) a newcomer could simply pick-and-place the one system she wants. And even, if these packages were centrally orchestrated, their API approaches could be at least similar to each other.

Some document could then be used to highlight the differences & pros/cons of each of them.


16.1.2005 kello 12:23, Adam D. Moss kirjoitti:

 Personally I think that self.something() / self.super.something()
is clearer than 'something' implicitly coming out of the class's
namespace.  A standardised object mechanism isn't likely to address
such personal preferences.