Re: package proposal

[David Given <dg@...>]

Asko Kauppi wrote:
[...]
> I'm not sure it can..  Remember, the initialisation function also has 
> the moudle name in it.  I'm not sure I like that very much, wouldn't a 
> specific function name (s.a. 'open_module()') be easier, and it would 
> allow free renaming of the file later.

This doesn't allow you to link all the modules together with the Lua runtime 
to form a static executable, because they'll all be exporting the same name. 
Not a particularly big issue, but it does add another layer of complexity.

--
[insert interesting .sig here]