Re: LuaChip and GC

[Asko Kauppi <asko.kauppi@...>]

Does that imply that more cpu cycles would be needed than in current 
Lua GC implementation?  Remember, in portable devices that means 
battery life so I'd be personally inclined to the existing solution.

-ak

11.8.2004 kello 13:00, Michael T. Richter kirjoitti:

>   Ideally it runs as a
> low-priority task (which could cause a problem if you have a lot of
> high-priority tasks gobbling memory, of course) and collects garbage a 
> cell
> at a time as long as nothing more important is running.