[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LuaChiea
- From: Michael Roth <mroth@...>
- Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:21:09 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mark Carter wrote:
| It seems to me that there's always going to be a kind schizophrenic
| tension in Lua, between those who want simplicity and cleanliness, and
| those who want the batteries included. If I may be facetious for a
| second, maybe the home page of Lua should contain the warning: "Are you
| /really/ sure you wouldn't much rather be programming in Python?"
You don't got it. Lua's primary goal is to be embeded in other
applications. Lua is like libz or like gtk. Lua is a software component.
The 'lua' command comes without cost, so it is included. But the 'lua'
command isn't the main goal of Lua.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBFijESIrOxc3jOmoRAhqGAJwPHAmJTMTEeqkgHwaYen30vF+8LwCfRDPs
f9TVN025l1vAYV1eE+daMyM=
=c/Qt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
