[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: RE: Packaging Lua libraries
- From: "Danilo Tuler" <tuler@...>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:30:45 -0300
> What about 3rd party libraries for those languages? I talked
> to a Windows guy I know and he said that in Perl at least
> they are named following the <libname>.dll scheme, e.g.
> mysql.dll or DBI.dll.
Yes. In Perl, all 3rd party libraries are redistributed as DLLs (with import
> I think that would be good enough, since the shared library
> is what matters for the use of a default loader script. So
> windows libraries could use the same scheme as the UNIX ones,
> just using .dll instead of .so.
Fine. Shared libraries are solved.
For static libraries I'll continue to use my "lib" prefix convention.