[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Why no metamethods for logical operators?
- From: Enrico Colombini <erix@...>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:09:54 +0100
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 18:24, Firestone, Rameses wrote:
> My main problem is I need + for + and * for *. So this wouldn't
> work for me. I can always use a function. The only problem is the
> syntax doesn't look so clear.
It's a question of tastes. I flirted with overridden operators in the past,
then I reverted to functions because I find them clearer :-)