[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Re: Lua for PalmOS - Some questions
- From: RLake@...
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:22:11 -0500
>From what I read on , you are not free to,
for example, get
>some code licensed under the FAL, and add it to a closed-source
>product (see term number 3). The MIT and BSD licenses allow you
>to do that.
Well, I am not a lawyer and all that. But it seems
to me that
term 3c allows you to do almost anything as long as
the executables, perhaps by prefixing them in some
distributing them along with the closed-source product.
bulks up your distribution a bit, but it certainly
prevent you from doing it. Similarly, 4a allows you
distribute your modifications in object form only,
as long as
you also distribute the originals.
Or am I missing something?