Re: Lua-users standard libraries project: anyone game?

[Reuben Thomas <rrt@...>]

> >I'm still not clear on why no Lua code is distributed with the
> >core distribution: it can be 100% portable, just like C code, and just as
> >useful and fundamental as the standard C libraries.
>
> Because adding things to the package means more things to worry about,
> things that must be kept up to date and that must work etc.

Seems reasonable.

> Anyway, what Lua code did you have in mind?

Perhaps I'm being really unclear. I meant the code in the standard
libraries project, as advertised. I hope that was clear, that was the
whole point of the announcement!

-- 
http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/ | wisdom, n.  knowing when to be foolish