Re: wxWindows vs. FLTK

["Jay Carlson" <nop@...>]

FLTK is under the LGPL (with a strange exemption for static linking??!?), so
it seemed reasonable and proper to treat code like the Fltk .h files adapted
for tolua as also being under the LGPL.

How would having Lua-FLTK under the MIT license have an effect on you, given
the FLTK license?

Jay
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eero Pajarre" <epajarre@koti.soon.fi>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <lua-l@tecgraf.puc-rio.br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: wxWindows vs. FLTK


> I wrote to this list related to these packages some time ago.
> At that time I ended up using wxwindows for two main reasons:
>
> The package had been updated more recently (2002 vs 2001)
> Wxwindows interface was under a license more suitable for me.
> (lua-fltk was/is under LGPL)
>
> Even though I at the moment use the wxwindows interface, I have
> reason to believe that FLTK might be better for my application.
> So I could volunteer to work with it. I would need to start
> from begining or request the current Lua-FLTK owner to release
> it under Lua/MIT license though.
>
>
>
> Eero
>
>
>
>
>