[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: wxLua and Lua-fltk issues
- From: Eero Pajarre <epajarre@...>
- Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:04:22 +0200
I have been looking at these two GUI libraries for my project.
I will write down in this mail some issues which I have noticed.
My notes might not be correct though, so I would very much
appreciate any corrections and usage hints.
Also feel free to comment on other alternatives (I am also
going to check Iup)
---------
Lua version support: (I am otherwise using Lua 5.0 alpha)
wxLua - I was first happy to see lua50 directory inside wxLua, but
when trying compile, it seems that at the moment Lua4.0 is
needed. (RegisterWXLua uses lua_newtag etc)
Lua-fltk - doesn't support Lua 5.0a. Because lua-flt seems to rely
on toLua, I guess the main limitation is in toLua 5.0
availability.
------------
Size: (actually not so essential for me)
wxLua seems to be the heavier one, but it also seems to have more
functionality. I do like the fltk look though.
------------
"liveness"
wxLua - the release, and latest updates are from October
Lua-fltk - the www page doesn't seem to be updated in 2002
(release from August 2001)
Both of the projects seem to be "one man operations", with not much
visible external activity.
--------------
Licensing: (I am at the moment rather suspicious agains anything with (L)GPL
requirements attached)
wxLua - claims wxWindows license, which in itself would be nice, because it
allows free binary distribution in addition to the LGPL license. I am
little woried though because of the wxLua and wxBasic relation. (wxBasic
is under LGPL AFAIK)
Lua-fltk - LPGL, I think this is more strict than FLTK itself, which although LGPL
allows static linking without suplying object files etc to the end user.
(So getting a license change to Lua-fltk might be possible)
------------------
Comments/Corrections ?
Eero