Re: Lua Stand-Alone changes in 5.0-alpha

[Philippe Lhoste <PhiLho@...>]

Philippe Lhoste <PhiLho@GMX.net> wrote in
news:Xns928F75BDE834APhiLho@80.91.224.249: 

Additional note on my rant: I *like* the new syntax, since it is simplier.
I prefer to type "lua foo.lua t1 t3" rather than "lua -c -f foo.lua t1 
t3"...

> BTW, if I go in picky mode, I would frown at the following lines:
>   status = handle_argv(argv, &interactive);
>   if (status == 0 && interactive) manual_input();
> handle_argv returns either EXIT_SUCCESS or EXIT_FAILURE.
> I believe you should write "if (status == EXIT_SUCCESS" instead, to be 
> consistent.
> End of picky mode :-)

Actuall, status can be EXIT_SUCCESS, EXIT_FAILURE, or the result of 
luaL_loadfile or lua_pcall... So I suppose it is safe to assume EXIT_SUCCESS 
is always 0 on all systems. Seems like a widely used convention anyway.

-- 
--=#=--=#=--=#=--=#=--=#=--=#=--=#=--=#=--=#=--
Philippe Lhoste (Paris -- France)
Professional programmer and amateur artist
http://jove.prohosting.com/~philho/