[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: syntax likes and dislikes (RE: Evaluating LUA)
- From: "Dan Partelly" <dan_partelly@...>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:21:37 +0300
My friend, as I statuated, this is not an argument, is a personal thing.
Maybe you like blondes and I like readheads. This dont makes you stupid, as
liking {} dont make me silly.
Im not here on this list to argue about what I like and what I dont like, im
here to learn using LUA efficinetly. I statuated what I like and what I
dont like, you can do the same, I could not care less.
Ciao, Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Reuben Thomas" <rrt@sc3d.org>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <lua-l@tecgraf.puc-rio.br>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: syntax likes and dislikes (RE: Evaluating LUA)
> > Of course, its an extremly personal thing. I just happen to think if -
> > then - end has a great redundancy. if {} is much more conchise.
>
> This is a silly argument. But I'm in a silly mood...
>
> Semantically, it's exactly the same thing (or put another way, the
> abstract syntax is the same).
>
> Otherwise, there are two things to count: characters and tokens. if () {}
> wins on characters (6-9, not counting spaces). if then end wins on tokens
> (3-5). Of course, if () wins in the case that you only need a block, not a
> statement, in both ways. But it sacrifices consistency to achieve this.
>
> --
> http://www.mupsych.org/~rrt/ | plagiarism, n. the mind burgles
>
>
>