[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Lua 5.0 (work0)
- From: Eric Tetz <erictetz@...>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
--- Roberto Ierusalimschy <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> We changed the names of some of them ('string', 'table'), but we could
> not think of good long names for the 'io' and the 'os' libraries...
For the 'os' namespace, several languages use 'system'. Not that I dislike 'os', I prefer short
Personally, I think splitting the Lua's tiny library up into all these different namespaces is
overkill. C++'s standard library dwarfs Lua's, and it does just fine with one namespace (std).
The most important thing is getting the library out of the user's namespace. I think one 'lua'
namespace would have been more than enough, and would have kept the namespace moniker short and
sweet (and impossible to forget).
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup