[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: License
- From: "Stephen Adam" <saadam@...>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:44:11 +1000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thatcher Ulrich" <tu@tulrich.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <lua-l@tecgraf.puc-rio.br>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 5:33 AM
Subject: Re: License
> There's nothing particularly wrong with the Lua license from a
> programmer's perspective; personally when I read it I think it's
> perfect. However, I am not a lawyer, nor do I want to be, so I'm not
> competent to *definitively* say what it means legally.
That's an interesting comment on the legal system, don't you
think? Everyone knows what it means except lawyers, because
it isn't written in *their* language. Too bad they don't use our
language. Perhaps when you hire a lawyer, you're really only
hiring a translator. :))
