[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: expat XML parser binding
- From: "Martin Spernau" <martin@...>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 20:34:43 +0100
I just stumbled over this... maybe the lxp-prefix is not so good for
Lua+expat...
<quote src="http://www.linuxworld.com/site-stories/2001/1128.lxp.html">
LXP (also known as mod_lxp) is an application server that runs as an Apache
DSO (Dynamic Shared Object) module. It is designed to allow for the
simplified development of data-driven, dynamic Web sites involving support
for XML, and SQL (through PostgreSQL).
</quote>
<seealso src="http://www.commandprompt.com/products_lxp.lxp" />
cheers, Martin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Carlson" <nop@nop.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <lua-l@tecgraf.puc-rio.br>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 6:05 AM
Subject: expat XML parser binding
> I've put a simple binding of expat, James Clark's C stream-based XML
parser
> up at http://www.place.org/~nop/lxp.tar.gz . No, not everything is bound,
> but it should be obvious how to bind more stuff to it.
>
> BTW, list rep of <methodCall kind="xuxu"> as {xml="methodCall",
kind="xuxu"}
> requires great care in the presence of tinsert/tremove, or you won't be
able
> to have attributes named "n". I'm leaning towards {"methodCall";
> attr={kind="xuxu}}, with contained elements from postion 2 onwards. Of
> course, lxp doesn't have any opinion, because it just does
> starttag/endtag....
>
> Jay
>
>