[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: RE: game developers?
- From: Falko Poiker <fpoiker@...>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 13:39:47 -0700
We chose Lua (over Python mainly, but also others) because it's fast and
has a small footprint. The other team in our company is using Python,
so we can easily compare the two languages.
Having gained some experience (about 2 months of implementation work so
far) I'm glad we chose lua: it's still fast and small, and I really
like how clean it is (especially when it comes to embedding it into
an existing application). But there are a few downsides: lack of
text documentation (Python has a bunch of O'Reilly books), almost
non-existant documentation within the code itself (again, compared
to Python - which has at least 1 comment per function, plus a really
long comment per file describing the purpose of the file) and lack of
examples (especially examples of how to embed the code in an application).
Knowing all the above, I would still choose lua over Python for our
Relic Entertainment Inc.
From: Brandon Van Every [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 12:23 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: game developers?
I'm aware from the Lua projects pages that several game developers, both
hobbyist and professional, have used Lua as the game engine's embedded
language. I am wondering what drove your decision to use Lua instead of
embeddable scripting languages? Most notably Python, as in my brief survey
what's available that seems like a good candidate. Anyways, tell me what
overriding concerns were, and also what they are now, having gained
Cheers, 3d graphics optimization jock
Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA
Experts eliminate the simpler mistakes in favor of the more
complex ones, thereby achieving a higher degree of stupidity. :-)