[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: RE: Small setback in porting Lua to Windows CE
- From: Adam Alpern <Adam.Alpern@...>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 14:33:29 -0700
It's all a matter of opinion and personal experience. At my job I write
software that runs on Windows NT, Solaris, AIX, and HP/UX (2 flavors of
each UNIX, no less). I've found that most of my pain comes on the UNIX
end of things, especially when you throw signals, threads, and C++ all
together. Others have had different experiences.
Lua's one of the most portable programming language implementations I've
seen in quite some time. Your milage may vary.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bennett Todd [SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 1998 1:39 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Re: Small setback in porting Lua to Windows CE
> I'd suggest to your Unix-infested colleagues that Windows is its own
> punishment, there's no excuse for trying to make Windows' peoples'
> harder, and even if they wanted to they don't stand a chance of
> competing with