[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [NoW] Once more about to-be-closed variables
- From: Dirk Laurie <dirk.laurie@...>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 10:06:25 +0200
Op Di. 2 Jul. 2019 om 23:10 het Egor Skriptunoff
> 2) About naming.
> "close" says about the value (the value will be closed) and says nothing about the variable
> "scope" says about the variable (the variable goes out of scope) and says nothing about the value
> We need a word emphasizing the semantical link between "value" and "variable"
No, we don't need such a word. It suffices to use existing terms properly.
The word "variable" emphasizes the semantic link between "value" and "name."