[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [NoW] Once more about to-be-closed variables
- From: Sean Conner <sean@...>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 19:20:59 -0400
It was thus said that the Great Egor Skriptunoff once stated:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:37 AM Sean Conner wrote:
> > Um ... it's Tuesday. Shouldn't this come out tomorrow?
> It's Wednesday in Moscow.
> So, I can start nitpicking.
> Apparently you still can not :-)
Ah. Darn timezones.
> > > Why they must be const?
> > I think it's to prevent the value from being lost and thus, not closed.
> Do we need this "protection"?
> Which adversary we should be protected from?
Typos, mistakes, stuff like that I guess.