[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Comment about IEEE floating-point rounding... (was: Setting Float Precision in Lua.c)
- From: Albert Chan <albertmcchan@...>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 12:29:53 -0400
On Jun 10, 2018, at 8:54 AM, sur-behoffski <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I managed publish an article in the November 1997 edition of Dr. Dobb's
> Journal. In that same edition, was an extended interview with Prof.
> William Kahan, entitled "A Conversation with William Kahan":
> IMHO, the entire Kahan article is well worth reading.
I thoroughly enjoy the read, highly recommended.
Kahan excerpt from above:
"I don't feel that the architects of Java are wicked so much as premature
to think that they can write a universal language for every man to write
everything to run everywhere. That isn't going to happen, it's going to be
a turf war -- Bill Joy against Bill Gates. It's a lousy reason to write a
language, to write it in order to precipitate a turf war to bring things into
a territory more advantageous to Sun than the current situation."
I am reading another Kakan article on Java and IEEE (not yet finished).
It seems there is good reason even for sign of zero. (+/- 0.0)
IEEE people certainly know what they are doing ...
my naming of thread maybe misleading.
I was only proposing a *default* precision setting.