[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: About syntactic sugar v:name(args)
- From: "Soni L." <fakedme@...>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:37:04 -0300
On 20/04/16 02:20 AM, 云风 Cloud Wu wrote:
We know v:name(args) is syntactic sugar for v.name
Could we make this syntactic sugar more flexible ? like this :
v:x.name <http://x.name>(args) -> v.x.name <http://v.x.name>(v, args)
Maybe it will be more useful especially when v is an userdata with
v.x can be a type object rather than a value belongs to v ( v1.x ==
v2.x when the type of v1 is the same with v2)
I remember proposing this before, but am too lazy to look for the thread.
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.