lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

On 20/04/16 02:20 AM, 云风 Cloud Wu wrote:
We know v:name(args) is syntactic sugar for <>(v,args) .

Could we make this syntactic sugar more flexible ? like this : <>(args) -> <>(v, args)

Maybe it will be more useful especially when v is an userdata with complex structures.

v.x can be a type object rather than a value belongs to v ( v1.x == v2.x when the type of v1 is the same with v2)

I remember proposing this before, but am too lazy to look for the thread.

Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.