lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Soni L. <> wrote:
> From reading the specs for Lua 5.2:
> and Lua 5.1:
> it seems that Lua 5.2's
> implementation is compliant with Lua 5.1's specification. That is, Lua 5.2
> simply defines what in Lua 5.1 is undefined.
> Can/should a Lua 5.1 interpreter use Lua 5.2's weak table behaviour?

I would agree that this would be permissible.

What IS PUC-Rio Lua 5.1's weak table behavior? And for that matter,
what's LuaJIT's behavior?

/s/ Adam