Le 08/07/2014 01:57, Leo Razoumov a écrit :Yes, I don't understand neither. Sometimes I'm thinking about switching to a different scripting language but actually I didn't find something that could replace Lua.
On 6/20/14, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Luiz,I'm sorry to see some of the math functions go.A preview of my mathx library for 5.3 is availabe at
lmathx is not part of the standard distribution and cannot be expected
to be present in all Lua installations.
I am still flabbergasted by the Lua's developers decision to remove
some of the C89 math functions
like cosh, sinh, tanh, etc. Is it in order to shrink the size of a
statically linked Lua executable?