lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Matthieu Tourne
<> wrote:
> This might be related to all the press around the recent Flame, the super
> advanced malware that uses Lua :
> As a result antivirus might have added Lua as a whole as a signature..

Because of the of "loadstring", Flame seems to be written in 5.1, but
the binary flagged is 5.2. Though I don't think it means much because
I would guess that 51 and 52 share a lot of code.

Anyway, shouldn't other software that embed Lua be flagged as well?
Also, is it happening only with that single binary?