[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
**Subject**: **Re: Arithmetic on strings**
**From**: Craig Barnes <craigbarnes85@...>
**Date**: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 00:12:52 +0100

On 7 July 2012 23:16, Duncan Cross <duncan.cross@gmail.com> wrote:
> This isn't the bike shed, it really is part of the nuclear reactor,
> though certainly a relatively small one.
>
> -Duncan
Actually that's what I wanted to say but I couldn't find the right words.
It does matter, but not massively, and on it's own isn't worth making
a backwards incompatible release for.

**References**:
**Re: Arithmetic on strings, ***Tim Hill*
**Re: Arithmetic on strings, ***Miles Bader*
**Re: Arithmetic on strings, ***steve donovan*
**Re: Arithmetic on strings, ***Dirk Laurie*
**RE: Arithmetic on strings, ***Alexandre Rion*
**Re: Arithmetic on strings, ***dcharno*
**Re: Arithmetic on strings, ***Coda Highland*
**Re: Arithmetic on strings, ***dcharno*
**Re: Arithmetic on strings, ***Craig Barnes*
**Re: Arithmetic on strings, ***Duncan Cross*