[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Stack with a tail call is missing function names?
- From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@...>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:32:17 +0200
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Paul K <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Right; make sense. I suspected something similar as I remember that a
> tail call doesn't create a separate frame on the stack (or something
> along those lines), but I was surprised that the function name has
> disappeared. Thanks for the details.
For further reading on tail calls: