[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Stack with a tail call is missing function names?
- From: Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@...>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:10:54 -0500
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Andrew Starks <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Paul K <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Hi Cosmin,
>> Yes, that's my case.
>> Does anyone know if this is a known limitation that is not going to be fixed?
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Cosmin Apreutesei
>> <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> maybe this answer could help?
If you're just debugging and don't need the tail call, you can
surround your function call with (f()), and them remove it when you're
done debugging... unless you're overflowing the stack and that's why
you're doing it that way. :)
Of course +0 works too...