[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Steve Donovan's ldoc: recognized function declaration formats and possible bug
- From: Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@...>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:26:31 -0500
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Reuben Thomas <email@example.com> wrote:
> LuaRocks is ideal then: either its self-contained (for truly portable
> deployment) or per-user (for software that can be "fitted in" to a
> hierarchy) could be used.
i've heard this (or similar) before; but still i haven't managed to do
a 'clean' install of anything that's LuaRocks dependent.
by clean i mean without _any_ LUA_PATH messing, dropping the packages
where i could find it with plain Lua.
for me, some help in the install process is a slight positive; but
even the slightest modification of runtime is a big deterrent.
can LuaRocks do such a clean install? if so, how?