[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Project lead nominations for standard libraries?
- From: Nathan Angelacos <nangel@...>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 07:59:38 -0800
On 01/04/11 05:50, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
I would have preferred some feedback on the real point of that
post, which is that namespaces (module names, if you prefer)
for possible additions to the almost-standard libraries that are
being discussed, could be allocated before the code implementing
them actually exists.
I do not see what this should achieve.
It takes a step in the direction of doing for Lua what IANA did for
First person with an idea gets to ask for the namespace (in IANA's case
a port number), and its reserved.
They document their API (in IANA's case, via RFC). Later other
implementations of the same thing are possible.
Today, if you connect to port 1194, you can expect to talk OpenVPN.
Some API's are so popular everyone wants to do their own implementation
(port 25, or 80) - Who knows what implementation is on the back end, but
the API is standardized.
Its not a perfect system, but the concept seems to have worked for the
Internet. It balances new innovation with protecting what has already
been done, and makes incremental improvements to existing APIs possible.