[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: bit.lshift and performance - luabitop v.s. lua-5.2.0-work4
- From: Miles Bader <miles@...>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:33:31 +0900
Mike Pall <email@example.com> writes:
>> bit.lshift (NUM, bit.band (COUNT, 31))
>> [instead of plain "bit.lshift (NUM, COUNT)"]
> Oh, sure. ;-) Because absolutely everyone is just waiting to
> rewrite all of their code with that bloat.
How much highly speed-critical Lua bitop-shift-using code is out there
anyway? Probably not all that much, I'd wager.
> Not gonna happen.
That really isn't clear....
Philosophy, n. A route of many roads leading from nowhere to nothing.