lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Jerome Vuarand <> wrote:
On the other hand I agree the current behaviour of lua_replace(L,
lua_gettop(L)) is counter-intuitive. IMHO it should either be a no-op
or throw an error.

It should not be a no-op. Functions that result in different stack depths, especially without producing an error, are very annoying.