lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:21 -0300, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo wrote:
> The whole point is that providing a bytecode verifier that is flawed 
> (even if it's only in malicious code) gives you an illusion of safety.
> And this is as bad, or actually worse, than having no verifier.

I say, stuck all that code in a module where it can peacefully grow to a
Turing-defeating AI the size of Windows Vista.