[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Core functions that return tables
- From: "Patrick Donnelly" <batrick.donnelly@...>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:28:36 -0600
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
> Possible, certainly. But once you go this route you have to decide about
> the semantics: for instance, should the function replace all fields in
> the table or just the ones that are absent?
Well I assume this would only be useful if you're making many calls
over and over using the same table (where a new table for each call
becomes costly). So it should just replace all fields... (updating
"One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing
to do and always a clever thing to say."