[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Function definitions in table constructors
- From: Miles Bader <miles@...>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:33:18 +0900
Mark Hamburg <email@example.com> writes:
>> so table-constructor methods have a lightweight syntax.
> But to really make it pay off one needs some way to also remove the need for
> a comma after the end.
Yeah, I've always found the need for "," or ";" inside table
constructors inside tables annoying... Do things become overly
ambiguous without them though?
Selfish, adj. Devoid of consideration for the selfishness of others.