[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: More thoughts on Lua 5.2
- From: "Evan DeMond" <evan.demond@...>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:51:19 -0500
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Duck <email@example.com> wrote:
I would like to reiterate my suggestion of introducing _three_ sorts of
official Lua library, let's call them core, auxiliary and optional.
Core and auxiliary would be restricted to ANSI-C only, which isn't _quite_
the case at the moment.
Optional libraries would contain officially-supported additional library
code which might not be supported or portable to all platforms, and which
IMO should start off with at least the following:
Just curious, I guess - what's the rationale for making these part of an official distribution?