[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Macros and expressivity [syntaxic sugar suggestion]
- From: Mildred <ml.mildred593@...>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:09:45 +0100
Le Tue 15/01/2008 à 15:14 steve donovan à écrit:
> That seems very elegant, precisely because it is a simple
> transformation, very much in the spirit of the generalized
> But, should 'in' be 'let', maybe? Do we need an extra keyword 'done'?
I used 'in' because I didn't wanted to introduce another keyword (in
fact I prefer syntax without keywords like smalltalk and others ... But
this doesn't prevent me from using Lua).
But really, it could be anything, 'in' doesn't sounds so good, you're
I would really like something like that come up in the next Lua
version, maybe if we could have the opinion on Lua authors on this ...
XMPP: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (GoogleTalk, Jabber)
GPG: 197C A7E6 645B 4299 6D37 684B 6F9D A8D6 [9A7D 2E2B]