[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Why was over estimated priority?
- From: KHMan <keinhong@...>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:46:48 +0800
> |> From: Ralph Hempel <email@example.com>
> |> Subject: Re:
> |> XenoLiz wrote:
> |> > Hm.
> |> > | Lua 5.1.2 Copyright (C) 1994-2007 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
> |> > | > two,m_two=2,-2 print(-2^2, -two^2, m_two^2)
> |> > | -4 -4 4
> |> >
> |> > Why was over estimated priority?
> |> because ^ binds higher than - and you are calculating
> |> -(2^2) which is now and has always been -4
> |> Ralph
> |> From: KHMan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> |> [snip snip]
> |> Also, the negative sign should always be considered a unary
> |> operator, (and the only thing with a higher priority is ^) not the
> |> negative sign of a negative number.
> I understand, what Lua so doing, I wondered for which Lua this do?
> In 60x-70x the priority of unar Ops( Fortran 6x-7x ) be less then infix Ops
> [was feel it the duty, what it's different positions], and we have this
Perl and Python also binds ** more strongly than a unary minus.
So I'd just use Lua a little differently compared to how I use
Fortran. In practice, I believe most people will remove doubt by
using parentheses. Sure, all languages have precedence for
operators, but no sane programmer writes complex expressions
without parentheses anyway.
Kein-Hong Man (esq.)
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia