[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: PATCH: 51w6 inheritable liolib + posix.popen (was PATCH:Lua5.0.2 popen/pclose fix)
- From: Mark Hamburg <mhamburg@...>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 11:15:14 -0700
I knew about the cache bits but I hadn't thought about the invalidation
issues. I'm now mulling over whether it would make sense to allow some but
not all metatable entries to be inheritable.
on 6/3/05 4:08 AM, Mike Pall at firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>> Is there a particular reason why metamethod search doesn't obey __index
> Metamethods are cached (or rather the non-existence of some of
> them). This is done with a few bits in the table anchor structure
> (of a metatable). A cache bit is set when a metamethod is
> looked up, but not found. The cache is invalidated when the
> metatable is modified.
> This simple scheme no longer works with recursive metamethod
> lookups. It would require an exhaustive search every time.
> While this is not so bad for __index (which is the reason why
> most tables have metatables in the first place), it's pretty
> bad for __mode (needed by the GC on every traversal).