[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] LuaBinaries
- From: David Burgess <dburgess@...>
- Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:16:40 +1000
Catching up with this thread. So my inputs on more than one message.
At the risk of re-starting old discussions I have not changed my DLL
names across minor version releases. My protection here is to
use exports by ordinal (requires a .def file).
On the OSs that I have used Lua:
My primary use of Lua is "embedded" in various apps rather than
Have I ever used Lua without any of the standard libs? No.
Have I ever used Lua without some of the standard libs? Yes
Have I always used additional libraries? Yes.
On Apr 2, 2005 5:16 AM, Roberto Ierusalimschy <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > I have suggested to name it 'lua51.dll' (for Lua 5.1).
> Maybe 'lua5_1.dll'? (Otherwise there may be some confusion between
> future DLLs for Lua 5.11 and for Lua 51.1. We must think big :)
> -- Roberto