[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: NaNs etc. once again. Was: Re: 5.1 and vc6
- From: Mark Hamburg <mhamburg@...>
- Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:32:40 -0800
I think one could separate the issues of whether NaN tests false in a
conditional context from what it does in an assert.
on 3/6/05 6:01 PM, Rici Lake at email@example.com wrote:
> So I'd be ok with NaN's being checked for by Lua, but the alternative
> of letting me use assert rather than some mysterious and possibly
> non-functional self-inequality check seems more pleasant.