[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: 51w4 vararg tailcall + upvalue bug fix
- From: "Adam D. Moss" <adam@...>
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 19:50:53 +0000
Mike Pall wrote:
Adam D. Moss wrote:
I've checked, and this fix made it to 5.1w5.
Yes and no. The fix is wrong (base should be ci->base). Compare to my
original bug report.
I did notice a difference, but I didn't think it was semantically
significant. But I was apparently wrong!
Adam D. Moss - email@example.com