[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: package proposal
- From: David Given <dg@...>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 03:36:05 +0100
Asko Kauppi wrote:
I'm not sure it can.. Remember, the initialisation function also has
the moudle name in it. I'm not sure I like that very much, wouldn't a
specific function name (s.a. 'open_module()') be easier, and it would
allow free renaming of the file later.
This doesn't allow you to link all the modules together with the Lua runtime
to form a static executable, because they'll all be exporting the same name.
Not a particularly big issue, but it does add another layer of complexity.
[insert interesting .sig here]