[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: +=
- From: Edgar Toernig <froese@...>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 01:37:26 +0200
Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo wrote:
> >Sol is not Lua.
> I'm glad someone else said that. But in this case, it's pretty clear that Sol
> is not Lua: it has a different name.
Right. It's not Lua. First I thought about naming it
"Sol - Stand Alone Lua". But because it is _not_ Lua
I called it "Sol - Son of Lua". Fits IMHO much better
and should make clear that it's not the same :-)
- Re: +=, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo