Lua Cheia Licensing

lua-users home
wiki

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 5c5,6
* It might be better to use the same License as Lua itself, which will be MIT for Lua 5
* It might be better to use the same License as Lua itself, which will be MIT for Lua 5
Ok, then let's go for the MIT license. Let's be pragmatical. --BDM

Changed: 8c9
* there is a need to distinguish between 'Core' modules, those that are distributed by standard and 'Additional' modules, which can basically be any kind of Lua-Module
* There is a need to distinguish between 'Core' modules, those that are distributed by standard and 'Additional' modules, which can basically be any kind of Lua-Module

Changed: 10c11
* Optional Modules could have any License desired by their author, as long as that icence does NOT compromize the License of the LuaCheia package
* Optional Modules could have any License desired by their author, as long as that Licence does NOT compromize the License of the LuaCheia package

Changed: 12c13
==Licening Philosophy==
==Licensing Philosophy==

Changed: 14c15
LuaCheia must at all times be open to everybody, and the Core should allways remain so.
LuaCheia must at all times be open to everybody, and the Core should always remain so.

collected here is a summary I have gained from the current discussion on LuaCheia, please feel free to comment or correct. --MartinSpernau

LuaCheia Core

Ok, then let's go for the MIT license. Let's be pragmatical. --BDM

LuaCheia Modules

Licensing Philosophy

LuaCheia should be available to an audience as large as possible. It should be possible to use LuaCheia for any purpose one desires, including commercial closed-source Applications.
LuaCheia must at all times be open to everybody, and the Core should always remain so.
Projects derived from LuaCheia should be allowed to choose their own License.

RecentChanges · preferences
edit · history
Last edited March 10, 2004 1:35 am GMT (diff)