lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


Can you share the reasons why it targets Lua 5.1 instead of the latest version?

---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.

> On May 13, 2023, at 2:01 AM, Glenn G. Chappell <glenn.chappell@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 6:50 AM Haoran Xu <haoranxu510@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Some of you might remember a post titled "Building the fastest Lua interpreter automatically" months ago.
>> After a few more months of work, I am glad to share the next step: Building a baseline JIT for Lua automatically.
>> In short, the post explained how we used a novel meta-compiler to automatically generate a high-performance baseline JIT for Lua from bytecode semantics specified in C++.
> 
> That's fantastic.
> 
> I'm wondering about the choice to go with Lua 5.1. Obviously, you
> can't compare LJR with LuaJIT if LJR is based on a later Lua version.
> But doing a later version would be useful, I think.
> -- 
> Glenn G. Chappell  <><  glenn.chappell@gmail.com