Re: Why is break not syntactically required to be the last statement in a block (anymore)?

[Scott Morgan <blumf@...>]

On 29/07/2022 15:23, Lorenzo Donati wrote:
> My scenario is about an algorithm that *inherently* needs some degree of 
> deep nesting to be efficient and more readable (some funky math algos 
> are that ways). So I assume that whoever has written the implementation 
> has already eliminated unneeded nesting levels and what is left is the 
> "most" clear and efficient implementation.

Out of interest, do you have any examples? The idea of needing these 
awkward constructs makes my teeth itch, but I can believe there must be 
some code that needs it.

Reveal the horrors please :)

Scott