Subject: Re: table.concat is inefficient for very long strings
From: "ubq323" <ubq323@ubq323.website>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 21:43:41 +0100
i wonder, what if table.concat could take an additional argument, to be used as
a hint for how big its buffer should be allocated?
obviously this wouldn't be without problems either, it's just a thought i had
right now.